The Case of Cases

This is a post that will hardly be of interest to anyone but me. No pictures, just words. No tasting comments, just thoughts. Anyone not interested can leave now: No offense will be taken.

I’ve been wondering lately about whether it would be possible to put together a case of wines that would enable wannabe winos to learn the world of wine on their own, at their own pace. I myself got hooked on wine long ago by just such a mixed case that a retailer in Baltimore put together for me so I could explore wine.

Of course, the wine world was a lot smaller back then, and very different from what it is now. That case cost about $100, which then was a substantial fraction of my monthly wage, and it consisted, if memory serves, entirely of French wines – because way back then if you wanted to understand wine, wine spoke French. Germany, Spain, and Portugal came up in wine conversation only peripherally, Italy and Austria very rarely, and California was the smallest, remotest blip on the radar. For most American wine lovers, South Africa, Argentina, Chile, Australia, and New Zealand did not exist as wine-producing countries, only as exotic vacation destinations.

I don’t have to tell you that much has changed since then, and genuinely for the better. The wine world is broader and far more diverse now, and field and cellar techniques have improved to such an extent that I can honestly say we’re living in a golden age of wine. We now get good, better-than-drinkable wine from almost every harvest, whereas “back then” one or two of every ten vintages were superior, three or four were OK, and five or six were not worth the drinking.

With all the changes that have occurred, I wondered what would happen today if a naif, as I then was, should walk into a good wine shop and ask a knowledgeable retailer to put together a case of wines to introduce him or her to the world of wine. Phew!  Talk about the labors of Hercules: It would be an impossible task. One bottle from each of the principal wine regions of the world would overflow the case. One bottle from each of the principal wine-producing nations would easily fill it – and what kind of introduction to wine would that be, with something like a single Napa Cabernet representing all the wine of the US, or one red Burgundy all of France?  No, the task couldn’t be approached that way: The whole question has to be rethought.

Perhaps it could be done by using benchmark wines, great ones that show the heights wine can reach. That, of course, is where cost comes into play. Wine prices, like medical costs and the cost of a college education, have increased at many times the rise in incomes, and many times the rate of inflation, especially in recent years. The present-day equivalent of my 1968 $100 would be approximately $725 now: $725 would merely be a down payment on a single bottle of young Château Margaux. Back then, Margaux and Lafite and such wines – the great Bordeaux first growths – were little more than twice the price of wines like Château Gloria and Château Brane Cantenac, which were included in my introductory case. If memory serves, I’m pretty sure those two then cost under $4 a bottle. So the option of structuring our hypothetical case around benchmark great wines can only be a pipe dream: The cost would be prohibitive for all but hedge fund multimillionaires.

So what about organizing by grape variety?  That is, for American wine lovers at least, a very popular approach to wine, so let’s consider it. If we start with white wines, Chardonnay demands inclusion – but its very popularity makes it a difficult choice. Which Chardonnay fairly represents the variety?  Burgundy?  Chablis?  Napa? Sonoma? Long Island? The Finger Lakes? Sicily? Friuli?  Oaked, or fermented in stainless steel?

That would be only Wine #1. Suppose we go on to #2: say Sauvignon blanc. From Sancerre or some other spot on the upper Loire? Or somewhere in California or New York? Or Friuli or Alto Adige? And where do we go for Wine #3?  Riesling, to be sure – but from the Rhine or Moselle, or from Alsace, or the Pacific Northwest, or Australia, or Austria, or Italy?

Only three grapes considered so far, and you see the dimensions of the problems. And the three varieties I’ve so far mentioned show the still built-in Francophilia of the wine world. We haven’t even considered any of the great white grape varieties of Spain and Portugal, Italy, and Greece. And beyond them, there is the plethora of “lesser varieties” from all these countries and from France, any one of which makes perfectly enjoyable wine. Once we say basta to white wines and move to reds, the problem becomes greater still: Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Pinot noir, Syrah, Cabernet franc, Mourvèdre – or, to break the Francophilia, Aglianico, Nebbiolo, Sangiovese, Touriga nacional, Tempranillo, Nerello mascalese, and maybe even Zinfandel.

It’s an endless task. For that reason, for the past 20 years I’ve resisted all suggestions that I update Mastering Wine. It’s impossible: That book’s format can never be used again, not for anything that pretends to be a thorough introduction to wine. No: There’s only one way that our hypothetical instructive case of wines could be assembled, and it’s by pure subjectivity. An individual could do it, drawing entirely on his or her own knowledge and preferences – making them clear, of course, every step of the way. That could produce a coherent collection, with both scope and focus and even some serious attention to cost control. I’m considering trying it, but it will be a time-consuming job, so stay tuned for developments – but not right away.

9 Responses to “The Case of Cases”

  1. dgourmac Says:

    This post resonated a great deal for me. It is reminiscent of my journey over the years, the primary difference being my encounters with 1964 Burgundies vs. your predilection for Bordeaux in those early years.

    I’ve been doing my own amateur version of Wine 101 for a small senior class (~20 students) at my alma mater for at least 16 years. I normally select 3 whites and 4 red wines, sometimes the same grapes from two different countries, and try to provide a range of terroirs and grapes. I usually avoid Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon, on the basis that if they have tried wines before, it is likely to be on or both of these. It also provides and opportunity to introduce them to Nerello Mascalese, Friulano, Assyrtiko, or Gaglioppo.

    I’ll be glad to share a list of the choices with you if you wish.

  2. Tablewine Says:

    Great post, Tom and hope eventually to see that instructive case. Perhaps a case based on the style of wine, oak/unoaked, new world/old world, varietal/blend, filtered/non-filtered, etc. would also be instructive.

    • Tom Maresca Says:

      Interesting ideas: All, I think, would also require a good deal of subjective judgement, but they all seem good ways to organize. Thanks.

  3. Philip H Christensen Says:

    “The Case of the Cases” promises a mystery by Earle Stanley Gardner, and it delivers. Carol and I live across the street from an enoteca specializing in Italian wines. Thoreau is remembered for traveling “a good deal in Concord,” though he wasn’t writing about grapes! With your guidance, Tom, we have graduated to phase two, and have built our case for Italian wines, though we still enjoy French, Californian, LI, Chilean, Argentinian, etc., and we are beginning to understand what we taste when it comes to Northern Italian vintages. If we live long enough, we may move on, but what’s the hurry?

  4. Hope Picker Says:

    This feels like a great dinner party topic. Back in the day, my friends loved to talk about which 5 musicians, past or present, we’d most like to hear play. I imagine comparing ideas for an introductory mixed case would also be fun…

  5. Jonathan Levine Says:

    I did enjoy this piece. I too have been asked by friends to suggest a mixed case and have wrestled with what to include. I would use one bottle of 12 varietals/regions, but with a strongly worded disclaimer.

    • Tom Maresca Says:

      The problems arise as soon as you get to specifics: Which region/varieties do you leave out? Which get in, and why? Tough questions, I think.

Leave a Reply to Tom Maresca Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.